Nimisha Malreddy
Product Designer & Researcher based in New York City🗽🍎. Currently a Product Design Intern @ The Met Museum



About
Resume 
Art & Design 


Streamlining Event Registration for The History Center.




Role
UX Researcher
UI Designer

Type
Client Project
Contributions
Research
Recruitment
User testing
Report writing
Design for solutions
Duration
4 weeks

Team
Self + 2 Students







Our Client


In this usability study, we partnered with the History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff, situated in Lake Forest, Illinois. For more than 45 years, this museum has been home to the stories of their regional community.





Problem Brief


After our initial kick-off meeting, we were able to identify 3 areas of focus for our usability study. The project brief outlined:


01.Analyzing the accessibility and discoverability of the 'do & see' section on the website, particularly emphasizing the ability to find and engage in events.
02.Evaluating the accessibility of membership-related actions, such as becoming a member or learning more about membership options.
03.Assessing the process of making a donation, whether one-time or recurring. 


Our approach for each of these areas involved addressing key questions:

i. Can users access the desired information with minimal steps?
ii. Can users clearly comprehend the information on that page?
iii. Is there any crucial information absent from the section?






Research Method


The method used to conduct this research was Moderated Remote User Testing. Our usability study for the History Center's website employed a streamlined approach. 









*participant information are represented below







Proposed Solutions


After identifying areas of improvement in the interface, we developed targeted solutions to address these issues:


01. Enhancements for ‘Do & See’



Users anticipated a direct ‘RSVP’ registration button.


Participants misunderstood that the events were distinct when, in reality, they pertained to the same event on different dates.


Prevents users from discovering the whole range of events.





Added a short description of the event along with the ‘RSVP’ button on the page.


Implemented a calendar view featuring dots to represent days with events being hosted.


Calender view allows users to browse events seamlessly.







02. Streamlined Registration Process



“I thought the form kept looping”  - Participant C

Users found it tedious to mandatorily enter emails of each attendee, especially when they did not have that information readily with them.

They expressed the need to be able to edit the attendee details.




Scrollable pop-up with all attendee information input fields at one place.


Additionally, made the email ID of other attendees optional.


This kept the users from abandoning the form and prioritise registration.







03. Simplified Post-Registration with Confirmation Feedback



Participants expressed that they could not find a way to opt out of the optional donation.


Lack of feedback after filling attendee details and confirming tickets caused confusion.

Users may feel stuck and decide to abandon the registration process.




Ethical design choice to provide a clear option to opt out of the donation.


Feedback indicating that the registration is complete at the end of ticketing process


Additionally, providing an option to edit attendee information







04. Enhancing Decision Making for Memberships



Participants expressed difficulty comparing the different membership tiers


The unattributed quotes were confusing as to what the membership offered








Providing a comparison of the membership tiers and highlighting the benefits each tier has to offer before the user decides to read more


This way, users can scan the information better and helps higlight benefits of each tier







Conclusion


In conclusion, the usability study provided valuable insights into users’ interaction with the History Center's website. The key insights are:




⚖️

Participants are more likely to be interested in getting a membership when presented with a comparision of its benefits
💵 

Users were considering abandoning the registration process if they couldn't find a way to opt out of the optional donation
🤔 

Lack of feedback after completion of registration led some users to inadvertently re-enter the attendee details








Appendix 



Report 
Questionnaire 
Participants response sheet